This scientific blog post aims to outline the evolution of interim measures in international law by examining them from a comparative perspective. Accordingly, it aspires to explore how the differing conceptions and interpretations of international courts have influenced one another over the past decades.

The scientific blog highlights the importance of the period after the conclusion of the Maastricht Treaty from the perspective of democratic legitimacy, and sheds light on the mainstream way of thinking.

While outlining the rationale behind the judicial cooperation in the European community of laws, the scientific blog post aims to explore the various forms of cooperation of the network of European courts in light of the principle of equality between Member States.